The Investors Daily has the details.
The actual measured temperature record shows something different: There have been hot years and hot decades since the turn of the last century, and colder years and colder decades. But the overall measured temperature shows no clear trend over the last century, at least not one that suggests runaway warming.
That is, until the NOAA’s statisticians “adjust” the data. Using complex statistical models, they change the data to reflect not reality, but their underlying theories of global warming. That’s clear from a simple fact of statistics: Data generate random errors, which cancel out over time. So by averaging data, the errors mostly disappear.
That’s not what NOAA does.
According to the NOAA, the errors aren’t random. They’re systematic. As we noted, all of their temperature adjustments lean cooler in the distant past, and warmer in the more recent past. But they’re very fuzzy about why this should be.
Far from legitimately “adjusting” anything, it appears they are cooking the data to show a politically correct trend toward global warming. Not by coincidence, that has been part and parcel of the government’s underlying policies for the better part of two decades.
What NOAA does aren’t niggling little changes, either.
Continue reading HERE.
Government cooking the books like this would be a major scandal if we had a nonpartisan press.
Even our local press has decided to join the partisan press and go along with the NOAA fraud to get along. Ignore the data, join the consensus crowd of fraudsters.
Don Rogers Union Publisher: When brought this NOAA fraud to his attention (here) in an email Rogers replied:
“I go with what I understand to be the preponderance of local, national, international data pointing toward warmer and link to higher greenhouse gases, including the latest analysis of NASA figures.”
That raises the question, what other government fraud does The Union accept? Rogers is worried about the “The Crisis in Journalsim” and then demonstrated he is part of the crisis by accepting the NOAA fraud.