The Climate Change Computer Models are Being Fudged

Dr. Patrick Michaels, director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute, provides insight into the debate over climate change and the political games played to create policy.
Dr. Patrick Michaels, who is the former Virginia State Climatologist has some strong comments about climate models during an interview with Mark Levin:

“It is nowhere near as warm as it’s ‘supposed’ to be,” says climatologist Dr. Patrick Michaels. “The computer models are making systematic, dramatic errors.”

There are 32 different computer models used to predict the climate, all of them run by government entities. And all of those models, except for the Russian model, are predicting far, far too much warming. The Russian model pretty much matches reality.

About Russ Steele

Freelance writer and climate change blogger. Russ spent twenty years in the Air Force as a navigator specializing in electronics warfare and digital systems. After his service he was employed for sixteen years as concept developer for TRW, an aerospace and automotive company, and then was CEO of a non-profit Internet provider for 18 months. Russ's articles have appeared in Comstock's Business, Capitol Journal, Trailer Life, Monitoring Times, and Idaho Magazine.
This entry was posted in Climate Change. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Climate Change Computer Models are Being Fudged

  1. George Rebane says:

    Erroneous computer models have just been one the several important factors about politicized global warming that give rise to the skepticism that many of us in science have had and written about for years. Whatever is happening with climate, the popularized conclusions, preventive policies, and over-the-top reporting are promoting one of the greatest episodes of global fraud since the tulip hysteria.


Comments are closed.